Stars are Souls - Michael Lewis

I always thought this guy sounded familiar to me. There was a guy on youtube, conspiracydude, that talked about his theory of Eminem being dead and replaced.

Anyway, I happened to find the channel today, and was just trying to see if the voices sound similar enough for me to post this.  I quickly scrolled thru this video and happened to land on 4:51 where he says he's talked about the flat earth.

Why I don't talk about Eminem anymore

I recall even other videos on other topics with this similar voice but I'm not sure if the videos were deleted off this channel or if there was another channel.  Start from the beginning and listen.

Latest round table, with Mike Lewis (Stars are Souls):



Flat Earth: Where's The Edge? What, No Leaders?
Flat Earth Conspiracy

Mark Sargent follows her round tables, and he commented on it:



minute 27
The question on whether there should be a leader, and whether people should vote on things. That's a concept I've been discussing here, too. And implementing it.

Mike Lewis is against it, but she keeps on talking about her idea.

minute 30
More about democracy and rules, although she never mentions it by name.

minute 35
About the need to know people personally before you can trust them. She says she needs to know about a person at least as much as the bank knows, or else she can't trust that person. Good luck trusting any flat earther then.

minute 37
LOL, she complains about flat earthers sharing publicly her private conversations. Yes, I noticed that, too. We might as well abolish private messages on Facebook and forums.

minute 44 and later
Mike Lewis and Lori Frary go over all the flat earth YouTubers / "leaders" to assess them, one by one, and see how well they fare as leaders. They conclude that Eric Dubay is no good, because he hates Jews. Lori says Matthew Boylan isn't good either.

minute 50
She lives in a "wealthy community on the west coast of Florida".

min. 54-55
Lori says that the the periodical awakenings of history got hijacked by the elites. "I watched the sixties getting hijacked".
I disagree, Lori. The sixties were promoted by the elite as part of a process to corrupt people's morality. You didn't listen to the tapes of John Todd and Dr.Dunegan:
fsr.boards.net/thread/36/illuminati

hour 1:13
On peak oil, collapse, and Michael Ruppert. They think he committed suicide, and peak oil is a scam. I disagree on both.

hour 1:17
Mike is shy and polite, and Lori is not letting him talk very much.

hour 1:25
Mike says "here in Florida". So he's in Florida, too.
One minute later, Mike talks about his YouTube channel, his Facebook group...
Hidden Continents (They're Hiding More Land)

This is his Facebook page:
www.facebook.com/mike.flatearthscientist

...and his book:
Beyond The Horizon - Modern Experiments That Confirm A Earth - Amazon.de- Mike Stars

hour 1:39
On how she was a leader even back in highschool, and made her highschool change the dress code

hour 1:41
OK, now she calls Rob Skiba a "shill" basically, but this doesn't make any sense, after complaining for being called a "shill" herself. She didn't learn her lesson.

Here we go again, they start discussing "shills" again.

hour 1:45
On giving people second chances after they have lied to you or offended you. Ah ah, they say they only give you a couple of opportunities and then they never want to see you again. LOL, good luck with the psycho flat earthers. If Lori acts like this, she's not going to be able to lead any movement. With the level of manners flat earthers have, you need to give them not one chance, but unlimited chances.

hour 1:52
Mike on his spirituality and how it was affected by his discovery of flat earth.

The long-awaited documentary, that he has been preparing for weeks:



They're Hiding Land - Flat Earth Explained Documentary
Stars are Souls

Flat Earth Experiment 1 - Is it colder in the Moonlight?
Stars are Souls

Stars are Souls; one of the first to introduce him to flat earth is, Conspiracy Dude.


Ryan~



youtu.be/cSBRmrC6efA?t=1928
youtu.be/cSBRmrC6efA?t=2911

hahaha




He didn't even touch natural selection. I guess it could be said he did when he mentioned survival of the fittest. But creationists don't disagree with natural selection, they generally agree with it, they believe in "kinds" that create offspring of the same "kind". But they don't disagree with natural selection and that the environment, including climate, geography, plants, humans and animals, plays a part in selecting from the genetics of all these "kinds".

The examples evolutionists use to prove evolution are often examples of natural selection. The creationist doesn't have much disagreement with natural selection, because they call the evolutionists real life examples "micro-evolution", and creationists say "macro-evolution" is what they don't believe in. Or that "micro-evolution" (i.e. natural selection) doesn't prove "macro-evolution"; the change from one kind to another kind. Yet, there are variations in each kind, and each kind as influences on other kinds (animals, plants, fish etc), this puts pressures on each kind, which selects those best fit (in other words, selects and deselects the genetics from the gene pool).  This creates differences between members of each "kind", including men and women, but the value and purpose attached to each life is from the minds of humans or God/s.  It is values which creates an ought and an ought not.

Yes, thanks for worrying about my sensitivity, but in this case I would not have found anything offensive in your post.

I do not follow Kropotkin's anarchist (and anti-communist) philosophy nor his unfortunate belief in evolution, but his criticism of competition and its analogous survival of the fittest doctrine are based on more years of methodological observation and study in Siberia than Darwin did in the Pacific Ocean.

Kropotkin correctly wrote that both human history and every kind of animal he studied shows that they naturally function and benefit based on cooperation. A prejudiced view of them as naturally competitive offers a less intelligent and less interesting analysis.

Yes, you bring up an interesting comparison of cooperation vs. competition. I see the dynamics of these two concepts, interacting, at the office every day, where I get screwed for cooperating with competitive people.

I cooperate and help everyone, and they all think for themselves, except for going on coffee breaks with the higher ups -- I see that as useless so I avoid doing it. Result: the slackers get promoted and I never get promoted. So maybe, through cooperation, I am indeed helping humanity to evolve, albeit at my expense. But this of course is nowhere near the seriousness and depth of your research. I just wanted to let you that I am reading and wanted to reply something.

But maybe I am not even helping humans to evolve, because I am not being promoted and not managing the bank -- and all this out of honesty, that makes me avoid kissing up. So maybe honesty gets in the way of evolution ("evolution" in the sense of an evolving technology, not in the common sense of the term).

But then again, maybe I am avoiding being promoted, because I know that I would be wasting even more time by entering into the dynamics of the higher ups -- who are even more corrupt than those below them. So I keep my part-time schedule, let them screw me in every aspect of my career, but at 13.00 my day at the office is over.

 And then there's also cooperation between humans and animals. Such as dogs.  In the case with dogs, especially in the West, dogs have become part of our in-group.




I know my dog watches my face and will respond to me if she thinks I have an upset or mad face (she doesn't like that and her mood changes when I smile and say her name). So there's cooperation between humans and dogs. But some say humans shouldn't have pets whatsoever, even though dogs evolved or were created, to read our facial expressions...

The Sun is God (+) The Moon is the Devil (-)
Stars are Souls

minute 1
criticism on Eric Dubay.

For some reason, Dubay and his minions have managed to thumb it down extensively, which they usually are unable to do (cf. Jeranism and Matt Boylan, in which case they got beaten on Eric's own channel). They were probably helped out by others who disagree on the content of sun vs. moon, and others who are prejudiced against blacks.

I woke up this morning, and all of a sudden, Stars are Souls had lost 20 subscribers, out of the blue. I went to his YouTube channel and sure enough, I found his "last video":



My last video (believe nothing)
Stars are Souls

There's probably something going on in Facebook and/or YouTube comments, but it is too hard to find out for now.

Now that Stars are Souls has quit, and Matt Boylan has been humiliated by that girl who was hosting him (via her audio uploaded by Eric Dubay on his channel), there are no pre-Dubay flat earth YouTubers left to compete with Dubay. They are all losing positions and will soon fall down, out of the top ten. But now Dubay has to deal with the new generation of flat earth YouTubers: Mark Sargent, TigerDan925, Jeranism, etcetera.

Son of a bitch! He made all his videos private (msot of the previous links still work) and now all there is on his channel is these 3 new videos:
www.youtube.com/user/yourmajezty/videos



I don't know if it is Dubay or who else that offended Stars are Souls, but the best ones in flat earth tend to be offended and leave the community. It happened to me as well, for several weeks. Then I came back.

OK, he's changed his mind again, for the umpteenth time, and now he's back, with a few selected videos:
www.youtube.com/user/yourmajezty/videos