Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2016 21:35:41 GMT 1
Keine Entjungferung für dich?
Btw, maybe you talked about it already, my apologies, what do you think of the Humanastory Mark's interviews?
It's so weird imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Feb 28, 2016 21:51:12 GMT 1
I think it sounds like BS to me. Sounds like a radio infomercial to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Feb 28, 2016 21:51:47 GMT 1
I have been trying to get my "stump" question on but to no avail.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2016 21:53:59 GMT 1
Do you think Mark gets paid by doing these Humanastory interviews?
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Feb 28, 2016 21:58:38 GMT 1
I have much speculation that I don't speak too much about. I think if Mark and Patricia get their subscription radio show they will be getting paid.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Feb 28, 2016 23:14:48 GMT 1
This keeps going and going and I feel like responding, just because. This will give me much to think about in regards into the FE mind. ----------------------------- Jeff Frazier +orderoverchaos said, "Blah, blah, blah, blah. Same chorus, second verse, a little bit louder, and a little bit worse."
I don't know what you do for a living, but here's a career suggestion: get a job as an interrogator. Anyone who had to deal with you for any length of time would confess on the spot just so you would leave them alone. You're like the Columbo of YouTube -- it's always just one more thing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- orderoverchaos~Jeff Frazier said,
"+orderoverchaos said, "Blah, blah, blah, blah. Same chorus, second verse, a little bit louder, and a little bit worse."
I have to repeat my question to you various times and ways, without an
actual answer to Mark's Truman Show model, so maybe that is why it
sounds repetitive to you.
Jeff Frazier said,
"I don't know
what you do for a living, but here's a career suggestion: get a job as
an interrogator. Anyone who had to deal with you for any length of time
would confess on the spot just so you would leave them alone. You're
like the Columbo of YouTube -- it's always just one more thing."
Considering that this isn't an interrogation room of any kind, and you are likely a
home or at least free to come and go as you please, your analogy to me
being an "interrogator" is faulty. In addition, these are questions
being publicly asked in regards to claims and models about the world we
all live in.
As for your last comment about it being "always just
one more thing", you have contradicted your first paragraph of your
last post to me.
Furthermore, how many times have you said bye to
me now? You keep coming back and not responding to the actual topic
for some reason though."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am, the Columbo of YouTube! I think maybe he can't help himself now? hahaha, ----------------------- Jeff Frazier+orderoverchaos
Oh, I get it. You're wondering how that rail gun works and if you can
buy one. My guess is no. You probably have to know somebody who knows
somebody who can show you the secret handshake.
My advice is to watch the Orphan Red video with Mark Sargent. He displays a variety of
secret-society hand gestures. I'm sure one of them would gain you access.
Good luck, and may the force be with you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- orderoverchaosNo, that isn't the topic of this thread or any thread I have started.
It is interesting to me that with all these posts you are still confused about the topic, the question, and which thread and which video to post
relevant comments on.
Hey, Mark is publicly putting this out there as a model and if you took his model seriously, you'd want answers
to it as well. Considering all of these posts of yours, I am unsure if you give Mark enough respect to treat him as intellectual equal and actually treat his claims as you would any other adult.
I don't know what his point in responding is anymore. I feel like he acts like Mark's protector, or that Mark needs this sort of defense? I don't know. Now this....He has this comment, ------------------------------------------- Jeff Frazier
"+orderoverchaos I'm certain after this extended dialog, your question
will be asked on the air. A very ingenious plan and well executed.
I can hardly wait until next Friday. That show ought to be very interesting, to say the least.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- orderovechaosWell, if you are correct, I hope that my question/s will be correctly stated,
while refraining from arguing against what I have not stated or not
asked.
Furthermore, this question should have been the very basis
and foundation of the model and without any need for time to make an
answer.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Feb 29, 2016 4:44:50 GMT 1
To both threads I have now added this~
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Feb 29, 2016 19:26:21 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 19:44:54 GMT 1
Thanks, interesting video. Some things I agree with, some others I don't agree with. He is a critical person like me. He constantly needs someone to criticize. I am more or less the same. But I will not go against flat earth just because I run out of things to criticize.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Feb 29, 2016 19:47:11 GMT 1
I think he's trying to do an American accent, which makes him harder for me to understand.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 1, 2016 4:04:40 GMT 1
13:59 / 29:30 Flat Earth Coffee Talk 5 with Humanatory markksargent Snide 2 says~ +orderoverchaos Don't know for sure but I think Mark believes that the governments that have signed the Antarctic treaty found a dome or barrier of some kind and then they started firing nukes at it .When you look at how the events unfolded, when the treaty was signed, operation fish bowl etc; I can see why he would come to that conclusion.
orderoverchaos responds~ +Snide 2 I hope he doesn't use that as a proof for the Truman Show. If one wants to believe those events prove an enclosure, they do not prove what that enclosure is for, nor the nature of the enclosure, nor the fundamental nature of world we live in. On today's #69 FEOHP show at about 1:32 minutes, Mark was saying the Earth's lava system has to be a controlled mechanical system because, as he says, if a super volcano went off it's game over. So, because his model requires it, we are told it is mechanical. But this is making reality fit his model. He is not giving us reasons, experiments or anything other than his model to believe it is mechanical. Additionally, on #69 FEOHOP he quotes the Truman Show around 1:47, "people accept the world that is presented to them". At 1:47:19 he says, "you want to make things efficient, and the most efficient way....and fake whatever's up there, and tell them whatever you want." His model says that we are in a planetarium and the night sky is a projection. But the night sky's lights, if they aren't as NASA says they are, this doesn't mean they are now fake stars. If NASA is wrong, we may only know that we have been told inaccurate stories of what is out in the sky, not that it is a fake solar system projected onto the sky/dome! Where is the evidence and arguments that leads to these conclusions? He also has said our world is a terrarium. So basically, these things altogether, leads the listener to hear that he is meaning to say the whole world as we know it is an artificial construct. What is the natural, genuine and authentic world, or systems, that is being used to judge what is artificial or real? To claim something is artificial requires one to have knowledge of what is natural and real. So now, what we once used to use as a reference point for the natural, and natural systems, is inside a Truman Show planetarium and terrarium.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 4, 2016 1:55:44 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2016 6:56:34 GMT 1
Oh, wow, amazing!
minute 1
"Mark Sargent and his lapdog Patricia..."
I am amazed by how he managed to keep free of conflicts of interests after being awarded a Flatty or maybe he was just mentioned in the Flatties. At any rate, I am far from being like that. I was in a conflict of interest for weeks and still am, just because of a few compliments on my videos.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 5, 2016 2:19:48 GMT 1
Flat Earth Coffee Talk 6 with Humanastory markksargent Time Stamp 9:56 I'm in this shit but look how my question was answered! You know what, I am a skeptic of the flat earth now. Was already happening but the paths of tidal waves prove the mercator map, or some version of it. So FE'ers have that map to deal with which needs to allow for seamless passage between east and west. Some say portals allow this to happen but this is not an answer to how the passage happens. A 4th dimensional shape, similar to a mobius strip, answers the seamless passage and fits best with a mercator style map. But I think this requires space to bend. I don't believe my question was answered properly as the question was not about FE or Globe. I have no need to debunk the theory of us being in a terrarium, planetarium or an artificial construct any longer. I believe it's done, we live in a natural world BECAUSE you need to have KNOWLEDGE of the REAL or NATURAL in order to know what is artificial. You CANNOT define your world as artificial because when you use the term " artificial" you are referring to the natural. You depend on that reference to make the argument and so the argument collapses in on itself. |
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 5, 2016 2:34:34 GMT 1
As for Daniel Pratt, I liked his last video. But in that video, or maybe it was another recent video, he was going on truthers being followers, and how he is trying to get rid of the myth that we need leaders.
I just think, man, he sees people are followers and he is trying to say needing leaders is a myth...But he complains truthers are followers.
Some people lead, many more follow. When you look at people, this is how they behave. I think I would be more at peace just accepting that this is how people are and with that knowledge work with what you have.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 5, 2016 2:37:03 GMT 1
hahah, fuck this shit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2016 12:54:31 GMT 1
Yeah, I am tired of the flat earth community, too, although I still remain a flat earther.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 7, 2016 0:41:46 GMT 1
Truman Show psyops expose Lee BrackerThe sound and visual effects are pretty ridiculous but they made me laugh. Anyway, I used this as an opportunity to put forth my argument. I think I am getting ever so slightly better at condensing this.  Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 7, 2016 2:03:38 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 10, 2016 2:52:15 GMT 1
Truman Show psyops expose Lee BrackerThe sound and visual effects are pretty ridiculous but they made me laugh. Anyway, I used this as an opportunity to put forth my argument. I think I am getting ever so slightly better at condensing this.
  Order over chaos is not a truther's name, quote, or motto... why are you basically anonymous? Redundancy comes from anonymity and fear is what drives trolls... you can say you're not a troll, but you are one. Otherwise, reveal yourself. You appear to practice the occult in secrecy with your brand name that is most definitely an interested party of a dystonian world as a result of destruction you think is the only way to achieve order. If you tell your friends to stop, the skies will clear and the fish return to the oceans all by themselves. To me that's order the easier softer way. haha, you are using ad hominem attacks after deleting my post and then
accusing me of being a troll and to reveal myself. Logic doesn't need
to be about the person, and in fact, it is illogical fallacious to do
so.
Order over chaos is not occultic whatsoever. It is a reverse
of Order Out of Chaos. God, is the harmonizing, ordering principle and
balances all things. That isn't occult.
But most importantly,
you deleted my logical argument against the Truman Show/Terrarium model
and accused me of being in the occult. But it is Truman who gets the
knowledge he is in the Truman Show and leaves. Poor baby.. you want people to see you, feel you, revel in your absurdity. God gave you birth, not a virtual reality to cloak yourself in. +Lee Bracker
That makes no sense. My complaint is you deleting my post and then you making accusations. If I have said anything absurd you have certainly put forth no argument to the table.
It is funny you bring up virtual relaity, because a planetarium, and a terrarium and the Truman Show are simulations... |
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 10, 2016 4:15:48 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 10, 2016 5:15:59 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 10, 2016 5:35:35 GMT 1
All my words have "to do is with fighting, arguing, sensationalism, and self-absorbed baloney all done in stealth of identity."
Yet, this is his video we are commenting under~
Truman Show psyops expose
Lee Bracker
His video is called, Truman Show psyops expose.
So, questioning the Truman Show model equates to fighting, arguing, sensationalism, and self-absorbed baloney!
Yet, before 2015, no one was talking about the Truman Show and flat earth that I ever saw...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2016 7:01:16 GMT 1
Mark is a suspected agent, as we always say, although we cannot be certain of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 11, 2016 1:41:04 GMT 1
Mark Sargent Robot Posting On Videos Related To Flat Earth Danny Wilten |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2016 7:20:16 GMT 1
Great clip. I will put it in today's compilation and I will add this Danny Wilten to the debunkers list, because he has 30,000 subscribers (top ten of debunkers).
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 12, 2016 20:13:19 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 12, 2016 20:22:10 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 13, 2016 20:34:55 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Mar 13, 2016 21:01:36 GMT 1
|
|
